No AccessJournal of UrologyAugmentation/Reconstruction1 Oct 2002Use of A Monti Channel For Administration of Antegrade Continence Enemas Elizabeth B. Yerkes, Richard C. Rink, Mark P. Cain, and Anthony J. Casale Elizabeth B. YerkesElizabeth B. Yerkes More articles by this author , Richard C. RinkRichard C. Rink More articles by this author , Mark P. CainMark P. Cain More articles by this author , and Anthony J. CasaleAnthony J. Casale More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64436-9AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract Purpose: Success with Malone antegrade continence enemas (MACE) requires reliable access to the colon and a customized enema regimen. Use of the appendix in situ provides a natural and well-vascularized conduit. When the appendix is absent or inadequate, alternative techniques are required. We report our experience using Monti channels to administer antegrade continence enemas. Materials and Methods: Of the 106 MACE procedures performed in 53 months a Monti-MACE was created in 13. Indications for use of ileum, technique, ease of catheterization and incidence of complications were reviewed. Results: Mean followup was 21.7 months. Two patients had transient difficulty advancing the catheter into the cecum. Stoma revisions were required for critical stenosis in 2 patients (15.4%). Stoma leakage occurred in 1 patient after multiple stoma revisions. Conclusions: The Monti-MACE provides continent access to the colon for antegrade enemas. The rate of stomal revision is only slightly higher than that reported for appendicocecostomy. While use of the appendix in situ remains our preference, reconfigured ileum is a reliable substitute in patients without a suitable appendix. References 1 : Preliminary report: the antegrade continence enema. Lancet1990; 336: 1217. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 2 : The clinical application of the Malone antegrade colonic enema. J Ped Surg1993; 28: 1012. Google Scholar 3 : Cecal flap conduit for antegrade continence enemas. Br J Surg1994; 81: 1215. Google Scholar 4 : Ileocaecostomy: an alternative surgical procedure for antegrade colonic enema. Br J Surg1996; 83: 507. Google Scholar 5 : Button device for antegrade enema in the treatment of incontinence and constipation. J Pediatr Surg1996; 31: 1038. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 6 : Continent appendicostomy in the bowel management of fecally incontinent children. J Ped Surg1997; 32: 1630. Google Scholar 7 : The in situ appendix in the Malone antegrade continence enema procedure for faecal incontinence. Br J Urol1997; 79: 985. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 8 : Fecal incontinence in children: treatment with percutaneous cecostomy tube placement—a prospective study. Radiology1997; 203: 621. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 9 : Laparoscopic appendicostomy for management of fecal incontinence. J Pediatr Surg1997; 32: 457. Google Scholar 10 : Transversely tubularized ileal segments for the Mitrofanoff or the Malone antegrade continence enema procedure: the Monti principle. Br J Urol1998; 81: 253. Google Scholar 11 : Simplified technique for antegrade continence enemas for fecal retention and incontinence. J Am Coll Surg1998; 187: 457. Google Scholar 12 : In situ imbricated appendix: experience with simple MACE technique. J Urol suppl1999; 161: 199. Google Scholar 13 : Modified technique of antegrade continence enema using a stapling device. J Urol2000; 163: 589. Link, Google Scholar 14 : Yang needle tunneling technique in creating antireflux and continent mechanisms. J Urol1993; 150: 830. Link, Google Scholar 15 : New techniques for construction of efferent conduits based on the Mitrofanoff principle. Urology1997; 49: 112. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 16 : A long continent ileovesicostomy using a single piece of bowel. J Urol1999; 162: 1743. Link, Google Scholar 17 : The Malone antegrade continence enema for neurogenic and structural fecal incontinence and constipation. J Urol1995; 154: 759. Link, Google Scholar 18 : Role of the antegrade continence enema in the management of the most debilitating childhood rectourogenital anomalies. J Urol1997; 158: 1277. Link, Google Scholar 19 : The Malone (antegrade continence enema) procedure: early experience. J Pediatr Surg1998; 33: 204. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 20 : Functional results following the antegrade continence enema procedure. Br J Surg1998; 85: 980. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 21 : The MACE procedure: experience in the United Kingdom. J Pediatr Surg1999; 34: 338. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 22 : Button caecostomy in the management of faecal incontinence. Br J Surg1997; 84: 694. Google Scholar 23 : The button cecostomy for management of fecal incontinence. Pediatr Surg Intl1999; 15: 559. Google Scholar 24 : Combined Mitrofanoff and antegrade continence enema procedures for urinary and fecal incontinence. J Urol1997; 158: 192. Link, Google Scholar 25 : Laparoscopic creation of a continent cecal tube for antegrade colonic irrigation. Urology1996; 47: 905. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 26 : Appendicovesicostomy and newer alternatives for the Mitrofanoff procedure: results in the last 100 patients at Riley Children’s Hospital. J Urol1999; 162: 1749. Link, Google Scholar 27 : Clinical applications of the Monti procedure as a continent catheterizable stoma. Urology1999; 54: 152. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 28 : Cystostomie continente trans-appendiculiaire dans le traitement des vessies neurologiques. Chir Pediatr1980; 21: 297. Google Scholar 29 Kaefer M. Rink R.C. Casale A. Stomal stenosis: appendicovesicostomy versus appendicocecostomy. Poster 48, American Academy of Pediatrics, October 2000 Google Scholar From the Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana© 2002 by American Urological Association, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byChu D, Balsara Z, Routh J, Ross S and Wiener J (2012) Experience with Glycerin for Antegrade Continence Enema in Patients with Neurogenic BowelJournal of Urology, VOL. 189, NO. 2, (690-693), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2013.Henrichon S, Hu B and Kurzrock E (2011) Detailed Assessment of Stomal Incontinence After Malone Antegrade Continence Enema: Development of a New Grading ScaleJournal of Urology, VOL. 187, NO. 2, (652-655), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2012.Bani-Hani A, Cain M, Kaefer M, Meldrum K, King S, Johnson C and Rink R (2008) The Malone Antegrade Continence Enema: Single Institutional ReviewJournal of Urology, VOL. 180, NO. 3, (1106-1110), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2008.DeFOOR W, MINEVICH E, REDDY P, BARQAWI A, KITCHENS D, SHELDON C and KOYLE M (2018) PERFORATION OF MALONE ANTEGRADE CONTINENCE ENEMA: DIAGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENTJournal of Urology, VOL. 174, NO. 4 Part 2, (1644-1646), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2005.HERNDON C, CAIN M, CASALE A and RINK R (2018) THE COLON FLAP/EXTENSION MALONE ANTEGRADE CONTINENCE ENEMA: AN ALTERNATIVE TO THE MONTI-MALONE ANTEGRADE CONTINENCE ENEMAJournal of Urology, VOL. 174, NO. 1, (299-302), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2005.KURZROCK E, KARPMAN E and STONE A (2018) COLONIC TUBES FOR THE ANTEGRADE CONTINENCE ENEMA: COMPARISON OF SURGICAL TECHNIQUEJournal of Urology, VOL. 172, NO. 2, (700-702), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2004. Volume 168Issue 4 Part 2October 2002Page: 1883-1885 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2002 by American Urological Association, Inc.Keywordsenemafecal incontinenceileum, catheterizationMetricsAuthor Information Elizabeth B. Yerkes More articles by this author Richard C. Rink More articles by this author Mark P. Cain More articles by this author Anthony J. Casale More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...